Managing Metadata

Jon Udell writes:

Metadata is data about data, a secondary thing that’s separate in some way from the primary thing to which it refers. But that definition begs a series of questions. Is metadata something we derive from data, or assign to it? Does it classify things, or enable us to search for things, or govern the behavior of things? If data that is described by metadata also, in turn, refers to other data, does it then qualify as both data and metadata?

As we weave more and better metadata into software, documents, Web sites, and file systems, the information stored in these various containers will become more available, more cohesive, and therefore more useful. The next challenge is how — in this new era of interconnected systems, people, and business processes — to unite these separate realms.

Where’s the Ambition?

That is a question asked by Russell Beattie.

All these startups in my feeds lately are killing me! There are tons of them, but none seem to be doing anything particularly special. I mean, its nice that theres a sort of rebirth of small startups, but theres absolutely no sort of wow factor that Ive seen. And no, this isnt an anti-Web 2.0 style backlash: I really believe in the idea of the web as a platform. Amazon and eBays web services are perfect examples of platforms which have created huge value for both companies, as well as the developers using their APIs. Thats not the problem. Its all these Flickr-wannabes, flip-it-quick companies that are bugging me.

It just seems that no one is trying to change the world any more. No one is aiming to create insanely great products or do the impossible. Why not? Why are so many people grasping at the low-hanging fruit, when theres so much more goodness for everyone if they just stretched a little higher?

Battle for the Soul of the MP3 Phone

Wired writes in a story about what went wrong with the ROKR phone: “Consumers want an iPod phone that will play any song, anytime, anywhere. Just four little problems: the cell carriers, the record labels, the handset makers, and Apple itself.”

What should a music phone offer? The specs aren’t hard to figure out. For starters, it should have clearly marked Pause and Play buttons so as not to trip up people like Steve Jobs. It should sync quickly and easily with your computer, and you should be able to use it to buy music at a reasonable price. It should play music from iTunes or any other music service. You should be able to choose different amounts of memory, and whatever you decide on, it shouldn’t be constrained to 100 songs – or any other arbitrary limit.

None of this is difficult. The technology to make a cell phone do double duty as an MP3 player is readily available. Motorola and other companies have been selling phones that play music in Europe and Asia for a couple of years now – handsets with lots of memory and serious audio capabilities. And with the iPod, Apple showed how to turn an ordinary MP3 player into a great one. Put it all together and you get – the ROKR? How does a great idea get this botched?